Whither Tango?

[Norbert Nemec]

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> "iota" is already present with the same semantics in 1.25 languages: C++ 
> and Go. Anyhow, what's a better name?

For me, a Google search for "C++ iota" only returns discussions about 
whether such a function actually exists in the STL. Is it really in the 
standard?

Anyway: Looking at the definition of ïota in Phobos, it simply seems to 
be a slicing operation with a stride. Most intuitive to me would be to 
rename the function to "slice" and the option step to "stride"?