A rationale for pure nothrow ---> @pure @nothrow (and nothing else changes)

["Jérôme M. Berger"]

Don wrote:
> To rephrase it: the rationale is that if it has a precedent as a keyword
> in C-family languages, it remains a keyword. If not, it uses @ syntax.
>
	And what happens if a future version of C/C++ adds a keyword for
something that exists as an @attribute in D?

		Jerome
-- 
mailto:jeberger at free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeberger at jabber.fr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20100226/e951b164/attachment.pgp>