Things to look up in the docs

bearophile bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Fri Jan 1 11:45:35 PST 2010


Simen kjaeraas:
> Seconded. Often I end up using is( typeof( { something } ) ) because
> it's faster than looking up and understanding how to write the
> equivalent isExpression. Yet, I don't have much of an idea of how
> to make it better. Is there a DIP for this?

I think is() has to be split in different things with a different (more intuitive) syntax/naming.

Bye,
bearophile



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list