@disable

Walter Bright newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Thu Jan 14 18:07:37 PST 2010


Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Exactly, it seems to me that the generalization in this case is
> counterproductive.

It's similar to the motivation for the "= delete" capability proposed 
for C++0x. Lawrence Crowl makes a good case for it:

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2326.html#delete

Lawrence mentions several uses for it.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list