Immutability by default [was: Re: Tidy auto [Was: Re: @disable]]

[Leandro Lucarella]

Adam D. Ruppe, el 19 de enero a las 10:56 me escribiste:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:52:16AM -0300, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> > I think he includes D1 code, which would be harder to port to D2. Makes
> > sense to me, that's why I think introducing the := operator as an alias to
> > immutable/const would be a good compromise. It makes extremely easy to use
> > immutable/const variables while keeping backward compatibility.
> 
> 
> Would this be a realistic fear with it?
> 
> receiver := 1;
> 
> reciever := 2; // meant to rebind, but spelling error goes unnoticed by compiler
> 
> 
> If so, bah. Of course, I like it how it is now anyway.

I don't understand, you are vulnerable to that kind of bugs now too:

const receiver = 1;

const reciever = 2; // meant to rebind, but spelling error goes unnoticed by compiler

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca)                     http://llucax.com.ar/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
aFR [afr at my.farts.cause.nuclear.reaction.org] has quit IRC (Ping timeout)