D Language 2.0

[bearophile]

BCS:
> > A better strategy is first of all to improve a lot the D GC, if
> That's true regardless :)

I don't agree, because that idea of mine can be wrong :-)

What I was saying is that first you improve the GC performance (if necessary modifying the language too) and you don't write parts of Phobos designed to not use the GC. And few years later (when there's already some amount of D2 code in the wild that uses the GC) when improving the GC is not possible anymore then you try to squeeze the lemon some more avoiding to use the GC :-)

Bye,
bearophile