Isn't it time

[Nick Sabalausky]

"dsimcha" <dsimcha at yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:hjd1h5$2s3k$1 at digitalmars.com...
> == Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a at a.a)'s article
>> ++vote
>
> The more idiomatic convention on this forum is vote++.  Is using ++vote an
> optimization in hope of making this happen faster?

Pet peeve, really. I've always found the semantics of post-inc/dec to be 
next-to-useless for anything besides obfuscation. Whenever I get around to 
designing my own language, "++x" will be dissalowed and "x++" will have 
pre-increment semantics.