TDPL a bad idea?

[Bane]

Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:

> Bane wrote:
> >> Why a killing of trees for a manual that changes daily and can be on the 
> >> internet? What is the point of TDPL? To make money? I don't see any value 
> >> in a set of pages that are a manual for a constantly changing and 
> >> unestablished computer programming language. Can't yaz save the trees and 
> >> offer it for sale on the web to anyone who wants to pay for it? It's easy 
> >> to setup a PayPal website (though I think D is far from that if ever). I 
> >> don't see this thing selling in bookstores. A hard copy of an already 
> >> obsolete specification? If it's just charitable contribution from long 
> >> time afficionados, why not just .org and ask for contributions and not 
> >> kill trees?
> >>
> > 
> > This might actually be a good point. I have a thought or 2 about it. A reason to save trees:
> >  - TDPL is changing, true, and online format is much easier to update, navigate, search, and eco friendly. TDPL would be obsolete (for current version of language) before it is published.
> 
> When TDPL is published D2 will be frozen.  That's the whole point.
> 
> -Lars

Aha! What about... D3 ? :)