Renaming std.conv

[torhu]

On 28.06.2010 01:09, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[...]
> We haven't reached consensus on where to put enforce() and friends. Any
> other ideas? Of the above, I like std.checks.
>
> Better yet, how about defining std.exception that includes a host of
> exception-related functionality (such as defining exceptions that retain
> file and line, perhaps stack traces etc.)?
>

How will std.exception relate to core.exception?  Seems to me having two 
module with that similiar names could easily be confusing.