Overhauling the notion of output range

Steven Schveighoffer schveiguy at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 12 14:39:34 PDT 2010


On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:25:43 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu  
<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:

> On 07/12/2010 02:41 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> I'm unsure how it will work either. I admit now that I didn't think
>> through how this will be used.
>
> It's very simple. As far as a user of an output range is concerned, they  
> should write stuff like:
>
> put(r, '[');
> char[] someBuf;
> put(r, someBuf);
> put(r, ", ");
> put(r, ']');
>
> in confidence that things are reasonably efficient.

How does that work for a range whose front() can be assigned a dchar?   
Wait, it doesn't, because it won't compile.

But wouldn't that be the same for a delegate that takes a dchar?

I'm very confused at what you are trying to do.  I expected that a char[]  
would be a valid output range.

-Steve


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list