poll about delete

[Graham St Jack]

On 28/07/10 05:47, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Max Samukha wrote:
>> On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> and scope storage class.
>>
>> If scope storage class is going, we need a library equivalent. Current
>> 'scoped' is not good due to 4500.
>
> Agreed. I know how to fix it.
>
> Andrei

I missed the previous discussions about removing the scoped storage 
class. Would you mind re-stating the argument here, or post a link to it?

FWIW I'm happy for delete to be removed.

-- 
Graham St Jack