Are iterators and ranges going to co-exist?
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Tue Jul 27 15:12:38 PDT 2010
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> On 20/07/2010 04:27, PercentEwe wrote:
>> As far as anyone not coming from C++ is concerned, ranges == iterators.
> Actually, thanks for pointing that out. It took me a while to figure
> that out, as it wasn't immediately clear.
> Sure, some D ranges also offer random access and are generally more
> powerful and better abstracted than iterators in other languages, but
> the basic functionality is still iterating/traversing and doing
> something on the current element.
Good point. Two highly related (and interrelated) pieces of work:
Oleg makes great points, but there are powerful retorts to many of them.
I dream of finding the time to write a retort to that work one day.
More information about the Digitalmars-d