Signed word lengths and indexes

[Don]

Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> BCS <none at anon.com> wrote:
> 
>> I still haven't seen anyone address how typeof(a>>>b) == typeof(a) 
>> breaks c code when a>>>b isn't legal c to begin with.
> 
> It doesn't, of course. However, it is desirable to have similar
> rules for similar operations, like >> and >>>.
> 
Which is why I said that it doesn't seem possible to make >>> work, 
without making a special-case rule for it.