Is there ANY chance we can fix the bitwise operator precedence rules?

[Jeff Nowakowski]

On 06/22/2010 08:39 AM, Don wrote:
>
> I think you misunderstood. I was arguing that there is no association
> between 'goto' and loops. People who use goto, use it for error
> handling, not for looping. I was by no means advocating the use of goto
> for error handling!

Oh good :) The looping part wasn't about "goto", it was about the 
alternate proposal of reusing "continue" to mean fallthrough.