any tool to at least partially convert C++ to D (htod for source

[Walter Bright]

Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> How dangerous would it be with a compiler option that 
> allowed the above and the programmer have to make sure that they don't 
> depend on each other?

The idea is to eliminate implementation-defined behavior as much as 
practical. I don't think it's at all easy for a programmer to look at a 
non-trivial static constructor and determine unequivocably that it does 
not depend on any imports.