A problem with generators

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 05:26:14PM -0400, bearophile wrote:
> It's really easy to use and remember, not bug prone. This possible syntax is about 75 times better than the current opApply:
> 
> yield(int) foo() {
>   yield 5;
> }


That's a *really* subjective statement. I understand pretty close to
instantly what opApply does - sends your data to the function inside
the loop.

Even with your explanation, I still don't really get what yield does.

-- 
Adam D. Ruppe
http://arsdnet.net