Alternative typeof syntax
eriatarka84 at gmail.com
Tue May 18 00:47:14 PDT 2010
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> Besides, I love member access syntax in general. In addition to (safely)
> reducing parenthesis, it also sidesteps the oddity that nested function
> calls are written/read *backwards* from the order of execution (ie,
> "A(B(C()))" means "call C, then B, then A"). I've even been toying with the
> idea of a language design that places primary emphasis on member-call syntax
> and consistent left-to-right ordering.
You mean like Smalltalk?
More information about the Digitalmars-d