Alternative typeof syntax

[Ary Borenszweig]

Clemens wrote:
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> 
>> Besides, I love member access syntax in general. In addition to (safely) 
>> reducing parenthesis, it also sidesteps the oddity that nested function 
>> calls are written/read *backwards* from the order of execution (ie, 
>> "A(B(C()))" means "call C, then B, then A"). I've even been toying with the 
>> idea of a language design that places primary emphasis on member-call syntax 
>> and consistent left-to-right ordering.
> 
> You mean like Smalltalk?

You mean like Ruby? :-)