Poll: Primary D version

[Adam Ruppe]

On 5/22/10, retard <re at tard.com.invalid> wrote:
> I can't believe the 64-bit processes are twice as large.

They probably aren't. I don't think we're talking about the same thing here.

I, and I don't think Nick is either, am not saying that 64-bit is bad.
We're just saying not having 64 bit isn't a big deal for most
applications, since 32-bit apps aren't bad either.

Yes, it would be nice to have a 64 bit compiler for when you need it,
but odds are, your application doesn't need it.