Poll: Primary D version

Walter Bright newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Tue May 25 14:22:47 PDT 2010

retard wrote:
> I don't think the D community is really interested in hearing something 
> positive about dynamically typed non-native languages. Traditionally 
> that's the best way to wreck your efficiency and it's tough to admit that 
> those languages are now better. The traditional native code way is to use 
> primitive compilers and brute force via inline asm.

If this were true, C and C++ would be dead languages. C++, for example, is often 
used in combination with Python. The C++ part is for the bits that need to be fast.

BTW, even the best compilers fall far short of what an expert can do with assembler.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list