Poll: Primary D version

[Walter Bright]

retard wrote:
> I don't think the D community is really interested in hearing something 
> positive about dynamically typed non-native languages. Traditionally 
> that's the best way to wreck your efficiency and it's tough to admit that 
> those languages are now better. The traditional native code way is to use 
> primitive compilers and brute force via inline asm.

If this were true, C and C++ would be dead languages. C++, for example, is often 
used in combination with Python. The C++ part is for the bits that need to be fast.

BTW, even the best compilers fall far short of what an expert can do with assembler.