C#5 desiderata

Simen kjaeraas simen.kjaras at gmail.com
Sun May 30 00:12:45 PDT 2010

Leandro Lucarella <llucax at gmail.com> wrote:

>> <g>. I just think that @ shouldn't be an excuse to be careless --
>> anything with an @ in front is still part of the language. That's
>> all.
> It shouldn't, that's (was?) the point of @. If the point of @ was to
> create a namespace for keywords, it sucks...

With compiler- or language-given @keywords, there is no difference
 from other keywords, except they don't eat valid identifiers. With a
user-configurable system, it's still part of a language, but that
language is specific to the component in which the @keywords are
being used, and thus does not pollute the namespace of keywords for
other projects.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list