datetime review part 2 [Update 2]
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Wed Nov 3 01:07:52 PDT 2010
New version: http://is.gd/gEu9W
I decided to try and take advantage of the new purity rules to make more of the
functions pure, so more of them are pure now, but between the inability to have
pure invariants and the majority of Phobos functions being impure, I didn't get
to make anywhere as many functions pure as I would like to.
I also found a bug in Clock.currStdTime() where it didn't convert it from the
unix epoch to the epoch that std time and SysTime use, so the current year was
in the first century A.D.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list