Marketing D [ was Re: GCC 4.6 ]

Christopher Bergqvist quasiconscious at gmail.com
Wed Nov 3 17:04:18 PDT 2010


Yes, I don't want to run Walter into bankruptcy though. ;)

Honestly, I do think it would change the perception of the language in a beneficial way if one could say that the whole reference compiler infrastructure were _unquestionably_ open source.

On Nov 3, 2010, at 21:17, "Jérôme M. Berger" <jeberger at free.fr> wrote:

> dsimcha wrote:
>> == Quote from Christopher Bergqvist (quasiconscious at gmail.com)'s article
>>> Would it be possible to organize a "bounty" for having the backend released u
>>> nder an OSI-approved license?
>> 
>> Vote++.  I understand that this has worked in the past, though I don't remember
>> off the top of my head what the project was.
> 
>    The first one I know of is Blender. I believe there have been a
> couple of others since.
> 
>        Jerome
> -- 
> mailto:jeberger at free.fr
> http://jeberger.free.fr
> Jabber: jeberger at jabber.fr
> 


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list