datetime review part 2 [Update 4]
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Tue Nov 9 17:45:16 PST 2010
On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 16:42:32 bearophile wrote:
> > An option may be to modify the compiler so it allows to override
> > protection in code contained inside unittest{...}.
>
> Another option is to modify the compiler so it sees unittests modules as
> part of another module (using a mixin() on a string import is too much
> hacky).
Having named unit tests would help a lot. Without those splitting out the unit
tests is a total no-go for me. I have definitely found that managing the unit
tests is easier when they are next to the functions that they're testing rather
than elsewhere. If they were named, then they would be easier to keep track of
at it would not be as big a deal, but it would stilll be problematic since it
would be harder to verify that each function is indeed properly tested. As it
is, you can just look right under the function to see its unit tests. It does
make it harder to find the actual functions, but I think that the maintainability
of having the unit tests right next to the functions is worth more. A proper IDE
would even negate the problem entirely, since then you could click on the
function name to go to.
As for simplifying the tests, a lot of them just would not turn into a loop very
well unless you were willing to increase the number of values being tested by a
fair margin. That would make the tests take that much longer to run. I'm sure
that if I took the time to, I could reduce some of the tests in terms of lines
of code without reducing what is being tested, but that's a lot of work to go to
at this point, and I have better things to be doing. Having the number of tests
that I do has been a big help, and if anything, there probably aren't enough of
them, so I'm not going to listen to any arguments to reduce their number (which
you apparently weren't arguing). I do agree that reducing their space could be
useful, but again, it would be a lot of work to do - many don't reduce as nicely
as they might first appear to, and that's a lot of tests to got through. If
Andrei were to insist that it be done before being put into Phobos, then I'd
have to do it, but as it is, they work, and I'd rather be spending my time on
more productive things. Maybe I'll spend some time to try and reduce the test
line count without reducing the tests at some point, but it does not seem worth
it right now.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list