datetime review part 2 [Update 4]

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Tuesday 09 November 2010 17:45:51 Yao G. wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:34:15 -0600, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>
> 
> wrote:
> > That's quite understandable, but that's part of the reason that the ddoc
> > html files are there.
> 
> Yes, but I also wanted to look at the implementation.
> 
> > You don't actually have to go trolling through the code to look at the
> > API.
> 
> I see what you did there :)

??? Oh my. Ouch. I did not mean trolling. I meant _trawling_. LOL. Sorry about 
that. That was _not_ on purpose. Funny though.

Feel free to look through the implementation. I just tried to make it so that it 
was reasonably easy to look at the API without worrying about the 
implementation. And while I do think that the implementation is important, I 
think that the API is far more important. To a great extent, the implementation 
can be fixed later if it needs to be, while the API can't really afford to change 
much once it's in Phobos. So, review it however you'd like, but you don't _have_ 
to look at the implementation, I do believe that the API itself is what's most 
critical.

- Jonathan M Davis