why a part of D community do not want go to D2 ?

[so]

>  - platform issues (not everyone agrees D2 is a perfect upgrade route -
> how is this even surprising? Look at the number of people *not* using D,
> it shouldn't be a surprise that there are people who dislike D2, but like
> D1)

There are so many people love C and "hate" C++. We know it is the same  
language with one of them has some nifty extra tools.
Generic programming, namespaces, easier OOP, operator/function overloading  
and many more.
Now why would they hate C++?
. politics
. politics related to certain features like OOP, operator overloading, you  
name it.
. complexity
Could you tell me anything other than this, that make sense?

> These are all my subjective opinions. Feel free to throw the first rock,
> after all I'm just a stupid troll.
Not always but can't say that i never see you trolling :P

>  - stylistic issues (OOP style structured Tango vs quick'n'dirty Phobos
> API) -> this causes annoying technical incompatibilities
>
> For me the technical issues have the greatest priority. If I want a full
> flexible Java style stream I/O interface and these kind of things,  
> there's
> no way in hell I'll let you shove the Phobos style ideology down my
> throat. I'd have to create a "PhoTango" wrapper to actually use these.

I am not comparing libraries and also not in a position to do that since  
didn't even see Tango.
But a question comes to mind. For library development (or just everything  
if that matters) is the top down OOP approach ideal/right way?
It is just an idiom that might have elegant solutions for certain tasks.

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/