RFC, ensureHeaped

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Friday, November 12, 2010 13:34:03 Pillsy wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
> > Pillsy:
> [...]
> 
> > > It has one other advantage, in that you can use the `scope`
> > > keyword for things other than varargs, like closures.
> > 
> > That scope syntax is already supported for closures, and it's partially
> > implemented (or fully implemented, I am not sure).
> 
> Oh, cool. I had no idea that `scope` was supported for function arguments
> at all.

in is actually const scope. So

void func(in Foo foo)


would be

void func(const scope Foo foo)


I'm not quite sure how that will work with scope going away though.

- Jonathan M Davis