std.date

[Kagamin]

Daniel Gibson Wrote:

> > I think, it's ok, computers work with nominal time and synchronize with world as needed. Hardly you can catch a bug with leap seconds.
> 
> As long as you're not Oracle and your enterprise clusterware crap reboots:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/07/oracle_leap_second/

Synchronization can fail if the code asserts that number of seconds is not greater than 59 (Jonathan's lib does the same, I think). Is it the cause?