GDC2 [Re: GDC2 compilation warnings]

[Graham Fawcett]

On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:45:52 -0500, bearophile wrote:

>>If you compare GDC1 and GDC2, you'll see the same thing. The problem is
>>likely because Phobos2 is heavily templated in comparison to Phobos1, so
>>you're pulling in a lot more functions than you bargain for.<
> 
> That little path tracer uses mostly the C std lib (or just it). And DMD2
> produces a twice smaller program (unstripped), so I think the problem is
> elsewhere.
> 
> 
>>Not sure what you are talking about. I'll be sure to have a look at it
>>later though. :~)<
> 
> Recently I have shown here a benchmark for D/C++ templates, that
> computes the number a well known problem (N queens problem):
> http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?
art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=122677
> 
> 
>>There is a Perl script included - gdmd - script that essentially mimics
>>this dmd functionality.<
> 
> I see.
> 
> 
>>File a bug against GCC then.<
> 
> I don't think they will change GCC about this. If this usability problem
> is to be solved, then it needs to be solved by GDC (or by the gdmd
> script that probably doesn't have this problem).
> 
> 
>> man gdc
> 
> OK.
> 
> 
>> version (GNU){}
> 
> I see. I think it has to be present in this page too:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/version.html
> 
> 
> Is someone able to tell me if RAND_MAX is hard-coded in Phobos?

$ find /usr/include/d/dmd/ | xargs grep "RAND_MAX.*="
/usr/include/d/dmd/druntime/import/core/stdc/stdlib.di:    enum RAND_MAX 
= 32767;
/usr/include/d/dmd/druntime/import/core/stdc/stdlib.d:enum RAND_MAX     = 
32767;