C#'s greatest mistakes

[Michel Fortin]

On 2010-11-27 20:55:51 -0500, Adam Burton <adz21c at gmail.com> said:

> Personally I think having an "implements" makes sense (that loops through
> the methods of an interface and checks the type has matching methods, not
> the same as having a class "implement" an interface which is more like
> inheritance). However as you say, that is not how interfaces in their
> current form are designed to be used so I understand why people disagree.

Well, if you consider the previously discussed 'adaptTo' function 
template, all types can be adapted to an interface (via a 
template-generated wrapper class). So "implements" for structs isn't 
too far off, as you can use the struct to implement the interface via 
'adaptTo'.


-- 
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.com
http://michelf.com/