const a storage class or a type modifier?

[Jens Mueller]

Don wrote:
> Jens Mueller wrote:
> >Walter Bright wrote:
> >>const in D1 is a storage class, in D2 it's a type modifier. The web
> >>page needs updating.
> >
> >I'm attaching an svn diff. Can you apply it? Since one doesn't need to
> >care about const then maybe one should drop the complete section. What
> >do you think?
> >I find this converting tutorial quite useful. Is there anything else
> >missing or wrong? I'd like to adjust it because it helps people to add C
> >libraries to D.
> >
> >Jens
> 
> I removed the section entirely for D2. It remains unaltered for D1.
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2201

Removing it leaves some questions open. At least the current thread
revealed some problems. What about the attached update?

Jens
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: htomodule.dd.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 837 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20101128/c590da48/attachment.patch>