On C/C++ undefined behaviours

[Bruno Medeiros]

On 21/08/2010 08:22, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "SK"<sk at metrokings.com>  wrote in message
> news:mailman.448.1282374566.13841.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Walter Bright
>> <newshound2 at digitalmars.com>  wrote:
>>> SK wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I love open source projects, but off the top of my head here are some
>>>> reasons that's not a general substitute for TIMI for D:
>>>> 1) What about closed source software?
>>>
>>> Won't work anyway. Java bytecodes are trivially turned back into source.
>>
>> IMO, reverse engineering technology is not the issue.
>>
>
> The *whole point* of closed-source is that the source isn't available. If
> Java bytecode is trivially turned back into meaningful source, then
> closed-source Java ain't closed-source anyway.
>

Obfuscated Java code/bytecode is definitively not turned back into 
meaningful source.


-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer