On C/C++ undefined behaviours (there is no "Eclipse")

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2010-10-05 17:04, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>> There was just something sloppy in Eclipse's startup code.
>>
>
> Any Eclipse IDE configuration/distribution is likely never going to
> start fast, at least as fast as comparable native IDEs like MS Visual
> Studio.
> Still, I do think that 80 seconds sounds excessive, even for those
> computer specs. But it's likely a CDT issue, not an Eclipse one. Again,
> this distinction has to be considered, you can't just say "There was
> just something sloppy in Eclipse's startup code" or "Eclipse developers
> don't care about performance issues _at all_". The projects that come
> bundled in offical Eclipse distributions are not only separate projects
> (JDT, CDT, WTP, PDT, Mylyn, etc.), like I mentioned in my original post,
> but they are made by completely separate teams, most of them from
> different companies (even for the more popular Eclipse projects).

I noticed quite a significant boost in the start up time for Eclipse 
when I updated to 3.6. I'm using Eclipse classic with the Descent plugin.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg