Tuple literal syntax

[retard]

Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:12:45 +0200, Simen kjaeraas wrote:

> retard <re at tard.com.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> If you don't have first class tuple constructors and define them with a
>> template, that's unfortunately not structural typing.
> 
> Might I inquire as to why?

I see these "tuples" defined with a template merely as structs in 
disguise. They don't cover all the cases where built-in first class 
tuples can be used.