Tuple literal syntax

[bearophile]

Lars T. Kyllingstad:

> Personally, I don't think we should start adding a dedicated tuple syntax 
> at this point.  There are so many things that are more important, and 
> besides, I think the library tuples are pretty cool.  We should instead 
> focus on making Tuple!(...) even better.

Tuples are a basic part of a language, they need to come before web tools, loggers, numeric libraries and so on. You build Phobos and all those things with a language. So if the language is better, you will work better.

>From what I've seen so far in this thread the Tuple/Record library solution will be kept, but some built-in syntax sugar (unpacking, and maybe for the literals) helps in making tuple usage more handy and clean.

Bye,
bearophile