duck!
Nick Sabalausky
a at a.a
Fri Oct 15 13:46:33 PDT 2010
"Andrei Alexandrescu" <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote in message
news:i9ae2n$k9g$1 at digitalmars.com...
>I was talking to Walter about Kenji's adaptTo. We both think it's a very
>powerful enabler, but adaptTo is a bland name. After discussing a few
>marketing strategies, I proposed "duck". It's short, simple, and evokes
>"duck typing".
>
> class C
> {
> int draw(){ return 10; }
> }
> interface Drawable
> {
> long draw();
> }
> ...
> auto c = new C;
> auto d = duck!Drawable(c); // awes
>
> Kenji, I'll be looking forward to your submission :o). Would be great to
> allow structs to duck, too!
>
Now that's one breed of duck I *can* get behind. Provides the duck benefits,
but without accidentally conflating naming with semantics everywhere like
the Ruby/Python ducks or even like Go's "spaghetti door" ducks (
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/dr6r4/talk_by_rob_pike_the_expressiveness_of_go_pdf/c12bi4h )
. Cool stuff.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list