struct field alignment

[BCS]

Hello Walter,

> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/attribute.html#align
> 
> Over time, it has become clear to me that there are only two useful
> alignments:
> 
> align     // set to whatever the C ABI alignment is
> align(1)  // pack everything in, no alignment padding
> I think any other alignments should be deprecated. Note that with
> align(1), any alignment is achievable simply by adding in byte fields
> where desired.
> 

If that's the case, then having a number in there seems silly: how about 
align and pack?

-- 
... <IXOYE><