Visual D Build + DMD Bugginess = Bad

Denis Koroskin 2korden at gmail.com
Mon Oct 18 13:50:18 PDT 2010


On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:41:54 +0400, Nick Sabalausky <a at a.a> wrote:

> "Rainer Schuetze" <r.sagitario at gmx.de> wrote in message
> news:i9f2ce$30re$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>
>> I've used ddmd as a medium sized project for testing. It has more than  
>> 400
>> files with most modules mutually importing each other. Some remarks:
>>
>> - compilation speed is a lot worse, even when compared to what you would
>> expect from a similar C/C++ project. It takes almost 8 minutes to  
>> compile
>> ddmd on my system with single file compilation, while the standard
>> compilation takes about 10 seconds.
>>
>
> Whaa...? Standard compilation of ddmd takes me a full two minutes.
>
>

Do you compile the code on 486 or something? :) Running the build script  
takes 7.967 seconds for me (timed with timeit, part of the Windows Server  
2003 Resource Kit Tools).


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list