[due diligence] std.xml
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Tue Oct 19 12:37:27 PDT 2010
On 10/19/10 14:30 CDT, Denis Koroskin wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:47:56 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
>
>> On 10/19/10 8:06 CDT, Justin Johansson wrote:
>>> This module should be removed altogether from Phobos forthwith.
>>>
>>> The code was obviously submitted and accepted without peer
>>> review, either that or the peers were idiots as well.
>>>
>>> It would be better to say that Phobos does not have an
>>> XML library yet, and to seek submissions, rather than
>>> maintain this piece of codswallop in the latest distribution.
>>>
>>> Let's not even talk of deprecation. Any D user currently
>>> using std.xml is completely misguided.
>>>
>>> Justin
>>
>> I haven't worked with XML all that much. Please make me understand the
>> matter better - is std.xml's speed the only concern, or is the module
>> generally obtuse to work with?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andrei
>
> I use it, but design is bad and performance is awful.
More detail about the design please? I browsed through the code and the
main issue seems to be heavy reliance on granular delegates to do pretty
much anything. Would fixing that improve usability? (It would most
likely improve performance.)
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list