struct field alignment

[Trass3r]

> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/attribute.html#align
>
> Over time, it has become clear to me that there are only two useful  
> alignments:
>
>    align     // set to whatever the C ABI alignment is
>    align(1)  // pack everything in, no alignment padding
>
> I think any other alignments should be deprecated. Note that with  
> align(1), any alignment is achievable simply by adding in byte fields  
> where desired.

Isn't the first case unnecessary if C ABI alignment is the default one  
anyway?