The Next Big Language

[retard]

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:05:58 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:

> retard wrote:
>> Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:30:50 -0400, bearophile wrote:
>> 
>>> retard:
>>>
>>> - "Safety features": it misses integral overflow tests and static
>>> contract checking (and many other things done by C lint tools, etc).
>> 
>> The list was describing the type system of the language. I can't agree
>> these are all part of the types or type systems.
> 
> Your list would be better if the terms were clickable links to their
> definitions. In fact, it could actually become a nice list this way.

That's a good idea. Doing that next.