Looking for champion - std.lang.d.lex

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Denis Koroskin" <2korden at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:op.vk2na9bpo7cclz at korden-pc...
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 06:55:22 +0400, Nick Sabalausky <a at a.a> wrote:
>
>> "bearophile" <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com> wrote in message
>> news:ia0410$1lju$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>> Nick Sabalausky:
>>>
>>>> But that's all if you want generalized lexing or parsing though. If you
>>>> just
>>>> want "lexing D code"/"parsing D code", then IMO anything other than
>>>> adapting
>>>> parts of DDMD would be the wrong way to go.
>>>
>>> Is the DDMD licence compatible with the Phobos one? Is the DDMD 
>>> author(s)
>>> willing?
>>>
>>
>> I'd certainly hope so. If it isn't, then that would probably mean DMD's 
>> FE
>> license is incompatible with Phobos. Which would be rather...weird.
>>
>> In any case, I asked that and a couple other Q's here, but haven't 
>> gotten an
>> answer yet:
>> http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5627
>>
>>
>
> Sorry, I wasn't checking the forum. IIRC DMD license is GPL so DDMD must 
> be GPL too but I'm all for relicensing it as Boost.

According to a random file I picked out of trunk, it's dual-licensed with 
GPL (not sure which version) and Artistic (also not sure which version)

http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/browser/trunk/src/access.c