Looking for champion - std.lang.d.lex

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Sun Oct 24 05:19:12 PDT 2010


On 2010-10-24 04:55, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "bearophile"<bearophileHUGS at lycos.com>  wrote in message
> news:ia0410$1lju$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> Nick Sabalausky:
>>
>>> But that's all if you want generalized lexing or parsing though. If you
>>> just
>>> want "lexing D code"/"parsing D code", then IMO anything other than
>>> adapting
>>> parts of DDMD would be the wrong way to go.
>>
>> Is the DDMD licence compatible with the Phobos one? Is the DDMD author(s)
>> willing?
>>
>
> I'd certainly hope so. If it isn't, then that would probably mean DMD's FE
> license is incompatible with Phobos. Which would be rather...weird.
>
> In any case, I asked that and a couple other Q's here, but haven't gotten an
> answer yet:
> http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5627

As Walter wrote in the first post of this thread: "generally follow 
along with the C++ one so that they can be maintained in tandem" and in 
another post: "Since the license is mine, I can change the D version to 
the Boost license, no problem." 
http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/read.php?server=news.digitalmars.com&group=digitalmars.D&artnum=120221

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list