Improving std.range.Zip

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 10/25/10 1:42 CDT, KennyTM~ wrote:
> On Oct 25, 10 14:04, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> This is coming full circle. At a point, map _did_ support multiple
>> ranges. Some people found that non-modular - if you want multiple
>> ranges, you should use map with zip...
>
> Except that at "that point"[1], map's multi-range support is equivalent to
>
> map!(func)(r1, r2, r3...) == map!(func)(chain(r1, r2, r3...))
>
> which is hardly useful. OTOH zipWithN is a very useful higher-order
> function.
>
> [1]:
> http://web.archive.org/web/20080417051734/www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_algorithm.html#map

Oh, you're right. Sorry!

Andrei