Quick question about target patforms . . .

Russel Winder russel at russel.org.uk
Mon Oct 25 09:48:11 PDT 2010


On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 12:11 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
[ . . . ]
> My understanding (and I haven't read the rules directly, just news  
> articles about them) is that they no longer mind if you use a tool to  
> *convert* something written for e.g. flash to objective-C code.  But I  
> think they still require you to build your app with their compiler.

I had understood from reading the press release and commentaries, that
the only constraint was that the application had to be self-contained
depending only on things delivered as standard by Apple in the OS
distribution.  This doesn't imply having to use their toolchain.  But I
may have misinterpreted.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at russel.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20101025/13f80cd8/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list