Quick question about target patforms . . .

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2010-10-25 18:56, Walter Bright wrote:
> Michel Fortin wrote:
>> Personally, I've found that, even though it works, the bridging
>> approach doesn't scale very well because of the insane amount of
>> generated glue code. That's why I changed course and abandoned my
>> bridge (the second in your list), working instead on making DMD
>> directly aware of the Objective-C object model. This way, you can have
>> extern(Objective-C) classes and use them as if they were D classes
>> (mostly), no wrapper class and no glue code necessary.
>> <http://michelf.com/weblog/2010/dobjc-dead-end-start-anew/>
>
>
> I think this is a worthy and valuable project, analogous to D's support
> for COM objects on Windows. Once you get it done, I'd like to get it
> folded into the main dmd. We'll also need a documentation page!
>
> Thanks for doing this.

Great to hear that you support this.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg