What do people here use as an IDE?

[Bruno Medeiros]

On 16/10/2010 10:50, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> Russel Winder wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 16:24 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> [ . . . ]
>>> Proper code completion, correctly jumping to function definitions, and various
>>> other features that IDEs generally do well tend to be quite poor in vim. It can
>>> do many of them on some level, but for instance, while ctags does give you the
>>> ability to jump to function declarations, it does quite poorly in the face of
>>> identical variable names across files. There are a number of IDE features that I
>>> would love to have and use but vim can't properly pull off. When I have a decent
>>> IDE, I'm always torn on whether to use vim or the IDE. vim (well, gvim)
>>> generally wins out, but sometimes the extra abilities of the IDE are just too
>>> useful. What I'd really like is full-featured IDE with complete and completely
>>> remappable vim bindings.
>>
>> Bizarrely the single feature that fails for me in Eclipse, NetBeans and
>> IntelliJ IDEA that I find the single most problematic feature in my
>> programming life -- which means Emacs remains the one true editor -- is
>> formatting comments.  I seemingly cannot survive without the ability to
>> reformat the paragraphs of comment blocks to a given width.  Emacs
>> handles this trivially in all languages I use for the modes I have.  The
>> IDEs seem unable to provide the functionality.  Usually they end up
>> reformatting my entire file to some bizarre formatting that is not the
>> one set up for the project.  I appreciate that being able to trivially
>> create properly formatted comments is probably uniquely my problem
>> but . . .
>>
> 	Same here, no IDE I've seen is able to format code and comments as
> well as (X)Emacs.
>
> 		Jerome

Interesting. For anyone else who shares that opinion, what are the IDE's 
that you have seen? In particular, does this include JDT?


-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer