Reporting TDPL bugs in Bugzilla

Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com
Wed Sep 1 13:27:51 PDT 2010


If they were clever they wouldn't target an audience of programmers. :)

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Stanislav Blinov
<stanislav.blinov at gmail.com> wrote:
> user wrote:
>>>
>>> To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
>>> compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
>>> easier to search for them.  These bugs have high priority.
>>
>>> To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
>>> compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
>>> easier to search for them.  These bugs have high priority.
>>
>> Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you fail
>> at compiler construction. The language is so full of shit.. why not be more
>> honest? you had over 10 years of time to develop basic foundations but its
>> still a amateurish attempt at language design. Tell me about another
>> language which is so much work in progress after 10 years of development.
>> They are all so stable. If I want I can build a 'E' language and fix all
>> your legacy bugs. D is nowhere near perfection. The bug #1 in your bugzilla
>> was 'just give up already'. Someone marked it wontfix.
>
> Is it just me, or spam bots suddenly became incredibly clever?
>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list