[Slight OT] TDPL in Russia

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Thu Sep 9 10:24:32 PDT 2010


On 9/9/10 12:19 CDT, dsimcha wrote:
> == Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org)'s article
>> On 09/09/2010 03:40 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> Broadcast DTV is shit. I
>>> honestly can't believe anyone was ever stupid enough to buy into the "DTV
>>> will give you more channels at better quality" bullshit. I mean seriously:
>>> you get interference on an analog signal and you get a little static
>>> overlaid - you get interference on digital signal and you get a dead fucking
>>> signal. Basic fucking electronic signaling. I saw through it from the start,
>>> but it's not like there was a damn thing I could have done about it - the
>>> overwhelming hordes of corporate lobbyists and consumer whores (Just visit
>>> "engadget") had spoken.
>> Actually DTV has error correction capabilities that are simply
>> impossible with analog signal. Clearly at a point you do end up simply
>> losing the carrier (I'm not sure what the noise margins are for digital
>> vs. analog) but clearly an ok-signal DTV broadcast is much better than
>> an ok-signal analog broadcast.
>> Andrei
>
> Yea, but the problem with ATSC (the American DTV standard) is that it's
> ridiculously susceptible to multipath distortion.  I live about a mile and change
> from the transmitter and have trouble watching stuff with only an indoor antenna.

USA latching onto an inferior TV standard and then fighting tooth and 
nail to improve equipment that puts up with it? I cry deja vu :o).

Andrei


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list