One more update on d-programming-language.org

[retard]

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 03:15:54 -0500, Yao G. wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 02:32:59 -0500, Lutger
> <lutger.blijdestijn at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Just for reference, this is the easy way to start fixing sites if you
>> don't know
>> where to begin:
>>
>> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http://d-programming-
language.org/
>>
>> The css validates 100%: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-
>> validator/validator?profile=css3&warning=2&uri=http://d-programming-
>> language.org/
> 
> I had a hell of a time trying to make DDOC generate valid documentation.
> It has a lot of inconsistencies or just plain weird and non-uniform ways
> to treat some standard macros. I had to resort to define macros with
> invalid markup, and those, assembled together would end up creating
> valid HTML 4.01 Strict documents. Ironic, I know. Maybe is that I just
> don't understand well how DDOC works. Go figure.
> 
> Not to mention few weeks ago when I tried to generate valid XML/DocBook
> files. I just gave up after a couple of hours. It's impossible.  :(

Have you considered using the community driven doc gen? Was it 'dil' or 
something?